The exhibition, while quite extensive, was engaging throughout. Much of the background I knew because of my work as a foreign correspondent, including reporting on European politics and historical background. Still, the explanations were very useful as a "refresher" and there were details I read about for the first time,
The exhibition, while quite extensive, was engaging throughout. Much of the background I knew because of my work as a foreign correspondent, including reporting on European politics and historical background. Still, the explanations were very useful as a "refresher" and there were details I read about for the first time,
Great article Fran. Art can be controversial—and, as this exhibition shows, it can also be a powerful instrument.
Was it fun to see so much of this style art together? Or did it become repetitive?